The New Civilization Catechism

[RolandVT]

[RolandVT]

For years, I’ve been working in the corporate finance department of a major European investment bank. In addition of analyzing the internal structure and workings of businesses, I had to analyze the structure and workings of their environment. Cities, provinces, countries, EU… up to and including the whole human civilization.

I developed unique and highly efficient technologies for analyzing all of the above… and came to a firm conclusion (beyond the reasonable doubt) that the existing (“Old”) human civilization as we know it is doomed. It will inevitably cease to exist and will be – no less inevitably – replaced with the New Civilization.

This book is an attempt to develop the blueprint for this New Civilization and for making a quantum leap from the Old Civilization to a new one. One of my competencies is reengineering of organizations so I am using the reengineering paradigm. Describing the situation AS IS (Old Civilization), TO BE (New Civilization) and the transition plan (quantum leap indeed) from the former to the latter.

Hence the structure and logic of the book. My background is in investment banking so it begins with Executive Summary. Parts I and II describe the Macrocosm (our Universe) and the Microcosm (human being) correspondingly.

These descriptions are based on unique theology – a derivative of Roman Catholicism - that I developed using my unique mystical, magical and psychic abilities, knowledge and skills.

Part III describes the Old Civilization – first and foremost, the currently dominant so-called “Liberal World Order” and proves beyond the reasonable doubt that it is doomed and will inevitably cease to exist in the not-so-distant future.

Part IV provides a detailed description of a New Civilization (New Macrocosm of sorts) and Part V – of a New Microcosm (New Civilization is impossible without reengineering human beings).

Part VI describes in detail the transition plan for a quantum leap from the Old Civilization to a new one. The book ends with Conclusions and an Appendix. The latter contains open letters to different categories of individuals.

After long (very long, actually) deliberation, I decided to structure this book as a Catechism – in Q&A format. Mainly because it contains answers to questions that interested and bothered me – it is well-known that every author writes the book that he/she desperately wants (needs) to read – but cannot find. And because it is based (in part) on my other similar book – The Dublin Catechism.

[RolandVT]

Materialistic (it flatly denies the existence of God) “mainstream science” claims that our Universe created itself out of nothing. Those who do believe in the Almighty God claim that our Universe was created by Him.

Obviously, the latter claim makes much more sense than the previous one… in fact, the “scientific” claim makes no sense at all.

[RolandVT]

Not all scientists - in fact, genuine science (when it is not used as a neo-pagan religion) is for the most part perfectly compatible with the existence of Almighty God. Many scientists believe in the latter – and that they study the world created by Him and laws of the nature established by Him as well.

Those who deny the existence of God (so-called “atheists”) do so because they are very uncomfortable (too uncomfortable) with the idea of judgement, responsibility and accountability for all bad things (“sins”) that they committed in their lifetime.

They will be judged and held accountable regardless – and, most likely, will be sent to Hell (actually, they will send themselves to Hell) for eternal torment.

[RolandVT]

Yes, God dwells outside our Universe – just like a forester (forest warden) lives outside the forest and cares about plants and animals in the forest… only God does it 24/7 – non-stop.

[RolandVT]

The Almighty God has no gender; all monotheistic religions traditionally present God as a masculine entity; however, in reality God is as much “She” as “He”.

[RolandVT]

Because He is driven by three fundamental desires (that we inherited from Him): to love, to be loved and to create something valuable in terms of aggregate value – financial, functional, emotional and (especially spiritual).

With all its obvious deficiencies, our Universe is “net positive” in terms of aggregate value.

[RolandVT]

It is entirely possible; in fact, the concept of Multiverse – a comprehensive set (or even a system) of separate universes is believed to be true by many prominent physicists (including Stephen Hawking – probably #1 in his area of expertise).

Some believe that all universes are bound by the same laws of physics; others think that each universe abides by its own laws of nature.

[RolandVT]

The Old Testament implicitly claims that we are – which makes complete sense (the inevitable rivalry between two different intelligent life forms would be way too risky for our Universe).

It would make far more sense for the Almighty God to provide every universe in the Multiverse with its own one and only intelligent life form – and vice versa - which is most probably the case.

[RolandVT]

Proponents of the interdimensional UFO hypothesis (IUH) believe that it is. They call the UFO/UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) ultraterrestrials and claim that they come not from outer space (i.e., are not aliens/extraterrestrials) but from parallel universes (other universes in the Multiverse).

The IUH far better explains the evidence about UFOs so I tend to agree with Meade Layne, John Keel, J. Allen Hynek of the Blue Book project, Jacques Vallée and other prominent ufologists that promote the IUH.